This is what happens when you don’t spank your children

I don’t like to spank my kids.  I don’t do it often.  But every once in awhile the bad behavior gets too out of hand and the palm of discipline has to descend with might and fury upon a non-compliant buttock.

There are other parents who steadfastly refuse to spank their children.

This is what happens to them.

Who in the hell thinks that they can put their hands on a law enforcement officer, then kick a law enforcement officer, and then talk their way out of getting taken down and put in handcuffs by saying “I’m a nice [person]?”

You hit daddy, daddy is going to hit you back.

If a child doesn’t learn that at an early age they grow up thinking that they can hit authority and not suffer repercussions.

I guarantee every one of these protesters wasn’t spanked when they threw a temper tantrum and they believe that they are entitled to throw temper tantrums without a spanking.

If you don’t spank your children when they are young, then eventually a law enforcement officer is going to end up spanking them with a baton as an adult.

Spread the love

The attack on self defense continues

Michelle Goldberg is a columnist with the New York Times and a contributor for MSNBC, so you have some idea what her politics are.

She Tweeted this:

The Left has always wanted to delegitimize self-defense.

If you are able to defend yourself, you are not reliant on big brother government to rush in and protect you.

That is why every clear cut case of self-defense they portray as “vigilante justice” or as the defending parts being “judge, jury, and executioner.”

They want to make the idea of self-defense unpalatable for honest citizens.

The problem is, that self-reliance hasn’t been entirely bred out of Americans just yet and the defunding of police and political stand-down has only made Americans more widely believe in that principle again.  The record spike in gun sales proves that.

 

Spread the love

A look into the entitled insanity of protesters attacking a car

This young woman was part of a group of protestors/rioters (prioters?) who were blocking traffic in Georgetown over the weekend.

One of the drivers tried to drive around the protest and this young woman documented it all and gave her opinion.  The resulting thread is very insightful.

No, it’s not an inconvenience. It is illegally denying people their freedom of movement. What if a parent was trying to get home to a kid who was alone or an elderly relative having a problem? These people have no authority to block roads and tell people where they can and cannot go.

Moreover, the wealth and color of the residents is irrelevant. Only the immorality of social justice says that it’s fine to do this to people because they are rich and white.

These protesters are blocking this woman’s way home. They are illegally detaining her. She tries to cut around them and they attack her car because she refused to submit to their abuse. The protesters treat her as the bad guy.

Again, the driver is in the right to try and get away from this terrifying and dangerous situation. These people are putting themselves at risk getting in the driver’s way.

The police are doing nothing because they should be arresting the protesters for assaulting the vehicle and blocking traffic but most likely have been told to stand down in the face of protesters.

Also, you cannot hate on the cops and demand the cops be defunded, then demand that that cops protect you from the ramifications of your own illegal actions.

That’s because the protesters were the ones breaking the law. The woman was clearly trying to get out of that situation. If she really wanted to run protestors over, she would have.

The police are right.

In two cases we’ve seen so far (the red truck in Oklahoma and the blue Jeep in Colorado) the drivers who had to drive through protesters to get to safety then obeyed the cops were not arrested. It seems as though the defacto state of driving through protesters is following defensive shooting rules. Do what you have to then turn yourself over to the police and make it clear you did it because you were scared since your vehicle was under attack. This woman obeyed the law as much as she could. She didn’t run people over and drive away. She was trying to get out of a threatening situation in her car and the police were on her side because of it.

That is the backup weapon for the protesters, doxing. In Colorado, we saw protesters record the Jeep’s license plate and spread the information on the internet. It’s not unreasonable to expect that these protestors will doxx you, follow you home, threaten you, and try to destroy your life.

Notice how she also yells at the cop at the same time as she wants the cop to arrest the person who tried to get away from her.

That’s because the woman broke no law and the protesters who were illegally blocking traffic and attacking cars were the threat.

Objectively, this woman has the situation backward.

This protester is the one doing the brutalizing. If she was almost killed it’s because she would have won a stupid prize for the very stupid game she was playing. She deserves a jail cell for this shit.

This is an open threat to doxx a scared woman who tried to drive around protesters who were blocking traffic and attacking cars.

Blocking traffic is not a peaceful protest. Attacking cars is not a peaceful protest. Doxing people is not a peaceful protest.

The police are protecting citizens from a violent mob. The violent mob doesn’t need protection from suburban residents who just want to get home in peace.

This thread was an incredible look into the mind of a protester. She feels entitled to block traffic and tell other people where they can go in their cars. She feels entitled to attack a woman who is scared out of her mind and is trying to get away from this madness. She feels entitled to tell the police to arrest a law-abiding citizen for not following her illegal orders. She feels entitles to destroy this woman’s life online because the woman didn’t want to submit to her abuse.

If there was ever a moment for an “are we the baddies” introspection, this is it. But that never happened.

These people live in a totally different world with totally different morality from the one we do and this thread proves it.

Spread the love

When the protesters tell you who they are, believe them

Anyone else notice the “landlords are next” tag? Are we still saying this is peaceful? Are we still saying this is about race? pic.twitter.com/RljS4EzsVa

 

The Hammer and Sickle and “landlords are next.”

These people are absolute communists.  This is not about police brutality.  This is the October Revolution in the soft hands of emotionally immature adults who have only known videogames and slacktivism.

 

Spread the love

What happens when the police are defunded?

Armed citizen street patrols.

The Left never learned the lesson of the rooftop Koreans.  When people are abandoned by the police, they don’t rollover and let the criminals destroy everything they have ever worked for.

When pushed too far they will arm up and defend themselves.

Minneapolis got pushed too far.

The defunding of the police is that abandonment made permanent.

The criminals were lucky.  Usually they’d get arrested and plead down to some minimum sentence.

Armed street patrols don’t arrest criminals.  They blow away criminals who get caught in the act.

 

Spread the love